The safest yield in your portfolio just started losing money

Private credit spent five years wearing a very convincing costume: a bond that pays like a stock, without the volatility of either. Millions of retirement dollars believed it. Then the publicly traded slice of that world, the part forced to show its homework every quarter, quietly turned unprofitable for the first time. The costume is slipping. So what were investors actually buying? Let’s understand.

But before we get to that, here’s a quick look at the markets and what matters this morning.

3 Movers in 3 Minutes

Almost no media coverage. Almost no public awareness.

But what they confirmed is one of the largest U.S. territorial expansions in modern history — a resource claim worth an estimated $500 trillion.

Thanks to sovereign U.S. law, this isn't just a national asset. It's an "American birthright."

Every citizen now has the legal right to stake a claim. Very few even know it exists.

The first profits will go to those who move early.

Get the full briefing while the "claim" window remains open

— Dylan Jovine, CEO & Founder, Behind the Markets

And with that out of the way, let's get to today's big story: the boring money that stopped being boring.

Twenty-eight out of fifty-three

That is how many publicly traded business development companies (BDC), the listed face of the private-credit boom, lost money in the first quarter of 2026. A year earlier, the number was twelve. 

As a group, these 53 funds went collectively unprofitable for the first time, swinging to an average loss of $7.6 million from a $26 million average profit the year before.

Hold that for a second. The product that was sold as the calm harbor, the thing your advisor pitched as steady income while stocks did their stock thing, just posted a loss across the board.

Private credit is simple in theory. Instead of a company borrowing from a bank or selling a bond, it borrows directly from an investment fund. The fund collects a fat interest rate, often floating, and passes most of it to investors. 

When rates went up in 2022 and 2023, those yields looked heroic. Money poured in. The asset class swelled past $3.5 trillion, and the pitch hardened into gospel: bank-beating income, none of the market noise.

Where the story stops adding up

Here is the tension. If these loans are floating rate, higher rates should mean more income, not losses. 

So why is the listed slice bleeding?

Well, two reasons, and both matter to you even if you have never owned a BDC.

The first is that the borrowers are hurting. 

A large share of private-credit loans went to mid-sized software and technology companies, the exact firms now getting squeezed as AI rewrites what their products are worth. When a borrower weakens, the lender has to mark the loan down. Blue Owl (OWL) took a $490 million writedown on one of its funds in the quarter, the largest since that fund was born.

Luke Lango was ranked America's #1 stock picker in 2020. He was mentored by two hedge fund billionaires from the Soros network and trained at Caltech. His readers have had the chance to see gains as high as AMD +8,500%... Nvidia +5,000%... Tesla +3,500%... Palantir +1,000%... and Apple +890%. Now he's releasing his next big pick.

This ad is sent on behalf of InvestorPlace Media at 1125 N. Charles Street, Baltimore, Maryland 21201. If you're not interested in this opportunity, please click here.

The second is sneakier. 

A growing number of these loans pay in something called PIK, payment in kind. The borrower does not send cash. It adds the interest owed onto the size of the loan, a promise to pay later stacked on a promise to pay later. The fund books that as income. It looks like a good quarter. But no money actually moved.

That is the trick at the heart of the anxiety. Private credit reports its own grades. These loans do not trade on a screen every second the way a bond does, so the manager decides what each one is worth. 

For years, that meant a suspiciously smooth line while public markets lurched around. Stability was the selling point. 

Now the losses are arriving, and the smoothness starts to look less like safety and more like a slow shutter over the window.

What the FS KKR quarter really showed

If you want the human version, look at FS KKR Capital (FSK), one of the largest listed BDCs. In the first quarter it swung to a net loss of $195 million, dragged down by realized and unrealized losses on its portfolio. Its net asset value per share fell. The share of loans no longer paying interest, the non-accruals, climbed. It cut its payout again. And it got hit with a shareholder lawsuit.

Every one of those lines tells the same story from a different angle. 

The dividend cut says the cash is thinner than promised. The rising non-accruals say more borrowers have simply stopped paying. The lawsuit says investors thought they were buying one thing and suspect they got another.

Zoom out and the market has already voted. 

The S&P BDC index is down 8.4% this year while the S&P 500 is up nearly 9%. That gap is the sound of a "safe" asset repricing in public, in real time, in a way its private twin does not have to.

The safest yield is the one that has already told you how it can go wrong.

The CEO of this AI company (click here to get the name, 100% free) just issued a CODE RED in an internal memo…

Warning his employees that they’re dealing with a critical situation.

Another company executive even implied they might need a government bailout.

And now Jim Rickards is predicting this company is about to go bust, in a full-blown AI meltdown that could be 10 times bigger than Lehman Brothers. 

Click here to see the details and learn how to prepare.

Today's reply prompt: Do you own anything, directly or in a fund, that pays you a yield you have never seen marked down? Hit reply and tell us what it is.

Until then, sip slowly! 

The Market Sip Desk