Editor’s note: Amazon Leo begins consumer service this year, and every headline says the same thing. Starlink now has a fight on its hands. But peer under the hood and something very strange shows up. Amazon is paying SpaceX for rocket rides. Amazon's satellite chief is a man Elon Musk once fired. And Amazon's own founder is quietly competing against Amazon. Turns out the space internet race was never really about who has the deepest pockets.

PREMIER FEATURE

Google Pays Apple $20 Billion a Year to Stay the Default Search Engine on iPhones.

Most people think it's about search. It's not. It's about data.

Google collects 20X more of it than Apple — fueling an ad revenue engine that generates $250 billion annually. In the AI era, that data is more valuable than ever.

While Big Tech profits from your clicks, searches, and behavior — Mode built a platform that lets users participate in the value they create. Its EarnOS platform rewards everyday smartphone activity and has already reached:

  • 490M+ users

  • $115M+ lifetime revenue

  • $1B+ earned and saved by users

As AI makes user data increasingly valuable, Mode's opportunity keeps growing — and they've already locked in their Nasdaq ticker $MODE.

Pre-IPO shares are still available at just $0.52, with up to 20% bonus shares.

Disclaimer:  Please read the offering circular and related risks at invest.modemobile.com. This is a paid advertisement for Mode Mobile’s Regulation A+ Offering. Mode Mobile recently received their ticker reservation with Nasdaq ($MODE), indicating an intent to IPO in the next 24 months. An intent to IPO is no guarantee that an actual IPO will occur. The Deloitte rankings are based on submitted applications and public company database research, with winners selected based on their fiscal-year revenue growth percentage over a three-year period.

But before we get to that, let's take a quick look at the markets and what matters…

Samsung posted blowout numbers and the stock fell 7%. That one line explains the whole tape today, a chip selloff going global while oil turns back into a war story.

3 Movers in 3 Minutes

  1. Samsung beat and bled. Samsung projected a 19-fold jump in quarterly earnings and the stock still dropped almost 7%, dragging South Korea's Kospi down nearly 5%. The number was strong. Expectations were stronger. This is the same trap that caught Tesla (TSLA) yesterday: when the whisper is above the beat, the beat sells off.

  2. The chip unwind went worldwide. Samsung's slide spread fast. Micron (MU) fell about 6% premarket, Intel (INTC) about 4%, and Samsung suppliers Applied Materials (AMAT) and Lam Research (LRCX) each shed around 5%. In Europe, ASML dropped about 5%, with STMicro and Infineon following. SK Hynix fell 6% in Asia, days before its $29 billion US listing. Day three of the semi correction, and now it has no borders.

  3. SpaceX joins the index into a down tape. SpaceX (SPCX) slipped ahead of its Nasdaq-100 inclusion today. Passive funds have to buy it at the open no matter what the tape does. Active money is selling risk into that forced bid. Note the irony against today's story: the one space name everyone wants to own is the one nobody can launch without.

3 Signals for Today

  1. Hormuz is hot again. Iran's Revolutionary Guard fired on two commercial ships near the Strait of Hormuz. Brent climbed back toward $73 and European gas rose. Yesterday's glut story is on hold. Watch energy names for a bid and the 10-year, already back to 4.49%, for more upside if oil holds.

  2. SK Hynix ADR listing looms. The world's second-largest memory maker wants to raise more than $29 billion on the Nasdaq this week. A 6% drop in Seoul the same week is a bad omen for the book. Weak demand here would confirm the Samsung read: AI memory optimism has run ahead of the buyers.

  3. FOMC June minutes land Wednesday. The first set under Chair Kevin Warsh. Futures now imply roughly 1.5 hikes over the next year, not cuts. With oil turning back up, the minutes matter more, not less. A hawkish tone into rising energy prices is the combination equities are least positioned for.

FROM OUR SPONSORS

The AI trade that made the Mag 7 soar is starting to crack.

Overpriced giants like Nvidia, Tesla, and Amazon are facing slowing returns — just as smaller, lesser-known names are positioning to take market share.

Waiting could be costly.

Three under-the-radar AI stocks are already showing the potential to outperform the Mag 7 in 2026.

Make sure these alternatives are on your radar before markets open tomorrow.

And with that out of the way, here's today's big story: why Amazon is quietly paying its biggest rival to try to beat it.

The Sip

Sometime in 1908, Henry Ford started making his own steel.

Then his own glass. Then his own rubber. He even bought a slab of rainforest in Brazil, named it Fordlandia, and planted rubber trees on it. Everybody thought he had lost the plot.

Because at the time, no other carmaker did anything like this. They bought parts from suppliers, put them together, and sold cars. Why complicate life? Why sink a fortune into things you could just buy on the open market at a fair price?

Well, Ford had figured out something the industry took another 30 years to catch up on. In a physical business, whoever owns the supply chain owns the margin. Everyone else is just paying rent.

Which brings us to what is happening in the sky right now.

For years, space internet had one serious player. SpaceX’s Starlink now beams broadband to more than 4 million paying subscribers across 100+ countries, from a constellation of over 10,000 satellites. And for years, everyone has been waiting for a challenger.

That challenger is Amazon. In 2019, the company announced Project Kuiper. The plan: launch 3,236 satellites, spend $10 billion, and take on Musk. Last year it quietly rebranded the whole thing to "Amazon Leo". And this week, Amazon confirmed that consumer service will launch commercially before the year ends. Enterprise pilots are already running with Verizon, AT&T, Vodafone, JetBlue, and NASA. Bank of America now expects total spend to hit $23 billion.

Sounds like a real fight. Except…

The man Musk fired is now the man losing to Musk

Amazon Leo is run by a man named Rajeev Badyal. Before he joined Amazon, Badyal was Vice President of Starlink at SpaceX. Which is to say, he was running the very programme Amazon Leo is now trying to compete with.

Then in 2018, Musk fired him. The reason, reportedly, was that progress at Starlink was too slow. Badyal walked out of SpaceX, took his ex-colleagues with him, and quietly started Project Kuiper for Jeff Bezos.

Eight years later, he is running behind schedule on the same problem.

The man Musk pushed out for going too slow on Starlink is now going too slow on the anti-Starlink.

But this isn’t really a story about one executive. It’s a story about what happens when you try to catch a company that owns everything underneath you.

The one number that changes the whole story

Here’s a number the headlines keep burying.

Because Musk owns the rocket, the factory, and the pad, SpaceX launches its own satellites for roughly $300,000 to $1 million per unit. Amazon does not own a rocket, so it buys launches on the open market. Going rate: about $5.5 to $6 million per satellite.

That is not a rounding difference. That is a ten times gap on the single biggest cost of the business.

Amazon has more cash than SpaceX has ever raised. It does not matter. Cash does not shrink a ten-times cost gap. It just funds more of the gap. And low earth orbit satellites decay in five to seven years, so the launch bill never ends. Which means Amazon’s margin per subscriber is capped somewhere below Starlink’s. Forever.

The plot twist no one talks about

Here comes the part where the story stops being merely awkward and turns absurd.

To catch Starlink, Amazon needed to launch satellites in a hurry. Its main partners, namely ULA, Ariane, and Blue Origin, kept slipping schedules. So Amazon did something no one expected. It went and bought rocket rides from SpaceX.

Three Falcon 9 flights were contracted in late 2023 and flew in mid-2025, carrying 24 Amazon Leo satellites each. Then in late 2025, Amazon quietly bought ten more Falcon 9 launches from SpaceX. The world only found out this January, in an FCC filing asking for a deadline extension.

Which means every rocket that helps Amazon Leo grow is also… funding Starlink’s cost advantage. Amazon is literally writing cheques to the company it is trying to displace.

And the deadline? Amazon needed 1,618 satellites in orbit by July 30, 2026. It will have about 700. The FCC waived the deadline in June but demoted the spectrum priority of anything launched late. A polite regulatory slap on the wrist.

Meanwhile, Bezos is competing with Bezos

If this were not strange enough already…

Jeff Bezos’s other space company, Blue Origin, was Amazon Leo’s main launch partner. About 45% of the $10 billion launch budget went there, which is why an Amazon shareholder sued the board in 2023 alleging self-dealing.

Then in January 2026, Blue Origin launched its own consumer satellite internet service to compete with Starlink. And, by extension, with Amazon Leo.

So Bezos is competing with Bezos. Amazon is paying Musk to help Amazon catch Musk. And the whole thing is being run by a man Musk fired for going too slow.

Somewhere, Henry Ford is nodding.

The Long Angle

The lesson here is much bigger than one company.

In a software business, capital wins. Copies are free, distribution is cheap, and the last dollar of revenue costs almost nothing. Whoever raises the most usually gets there first.

In a physical business, capital does not save you. The last dollar of revenue costs almost as much as the first, and that cost is set by whoever owns the supply chain. The winner is decided long before the customer swipes a card.

This is why TSMC dominates chip fabs, why Chinese solar makers set the global panel price, why Rio Tinto still runs iron ore. And it is why SpaceX will very likely keep running space internet, even as Amazon sinks another $20 billion into trying to stop it.

So the next time you read that Company X is a serious challenger to Company Y in a real-world industry, skip the balance sheet. Check the supply chain. If X is paying Y for the pipes, or the chips, or the rockets, then the challenge is not a challenge. It is an annuity for the incumbent.

Because in space, as on Earth, the deepest moat is not what sits in the bank.

It is who owns the road.

PARTNER SPOTLIGHT

Hidden in Tesla's Filing: A $12 Billion "Super Startup"

Pull up Tesla's most recent SEC filing. Page 5.

And you'll see a single line showing $12 billion in revenue from a brand-new "super startup" Elon Musk has been quietly incubating inside Tesla.

But it sits at the center of what Blackstone calls "a $23 trillion investment opportunity."

And on July 22, Elon is expected to pull back the curtain and reveal exactly what he's building.

But Adam O'Dell already knows… and he reveals it all in this urgent video.

The MarketSips Takeaway

Vertical integration is the quietest superpower in business. It never shows up on the income statement in a single line, and it never dominates a press release. It hides inside unit economics, and it compounds decade after decade. Every physical industry has one incumbent who owns the road, and one hopeful challenger who is renting the road to try and displace them. Guess who usually wins.

Today's reply prompt: Which industry do you think has a vertical-integration moat the market is currently underappreciating?

Until then, sip slowly!

The Market Sip Desk

Keep Reading